Trade Recovery Data

screen decision memo

Decision memo

Should leadership buy the $1,500 Tariff Margin Analysis Screen?

Use this memo when finance, operations, trade compliance, or a broker partner needs a quick business case before sending a non-confidential fit request.

Organized trade records used to represent a tariff margin screen decision memo
The screen is meant to answer whether a bigger specialist conversation is worth the time, not to replace that specialist.

The company has enough duty cost and record ownership to make a first read useful.

  • Annual duty or tariff spend is likely material to margin.
  • Finance can identify where duty cost lands in COGS, landed cost, or product margin.
  • Operations can name likely source systems for import, shipment, export, replacement, rejection, or destruction records.
  • Leadership wants a stop/go packet before paying for deeper claim-facing work.

The right answer may be internal cleanup before any paid review.

  • Annual duty spend is immaterial or unknown and no one can estimate it.
  • No one can identify the broker, ERP, shipment, invoice, SKU, or export record owner.
  • The company wants a refund guarantee, legal opinion, HTS classification, or claim filing.
  • The buyer is unwilling to use licensed professionals for claim-facing work.

The internal buyer is usually finance plus the record owner.

The best sponsor is a CFO, controller, finance operator, trade-compliance owner, or operations leader who can connect margin impact to the people who control the records.

The screen caps the first spend and prevents premature claim work.

  • Fixed $1,500 fee after fit and scope confirmation.
  • No source records through public forms or ordinary email.
  • Explicit boundaries around legal, brokerage, classification, filing, and refund claims.
  • Stop conditions are valid outcomes, not sales failures.

The deliverable should help leadership decide the next move.

  • Proceed to licensed specialist review.
  • Fix record ownership, match keys, or source gaps first.
  • Stop because materiality or traceability does not justify more spend.
  • Prepare better questions for a broker, drawback specialist, attorney, CPA, or trade professional.

One-sentence business case.

Spend a capped $1,500 to find out whether tariff cost in COGS has enough materiality and record traceability to justify a more expensive licensed specialist review.

Start a non-confidential fit request